Fernando Alonso says Formula One’s reduced 20-car field is sufficient despite the loss of two more cars over the winter.
The loss of Manor during the off-season means the F1 grid has shrunk from 24 cars to 20 in three years. Up to 26 cars are permitted to start a race by the rules but Alonso sees no need to bring more teams in.
“I think it’s enough,” he said when asked if 20 cars was enough to satisfy F1 spectators.
“Obviously it’s nice to have many cars on the track and many teams in Formula One.”
“But at the same point it’s a sport that is quite difficult to get in, quite difficult to stay for many years. We see with some of the smaller teams they are struggling to keep the financial situation healthy in the years.”
“If you have a good ten teams and 20 cars on track it’s more or less the number we see in Formula One for many years.”
Ross Brawn, who has taken responsibility for shaping Formula One’s future rules following its takeover by Liberty Media, has indicated he would like to see “13 strong teams” in the sport. Formula One hasn’t had a full grid of cars for more than two decades.
The collapse of Manor during the off-season followed the disappearance of Caterham at the end of 2014 and HRT two years before that. Last year Sauber ran into financial problems but eventually attracted new investment from Longbow Finance.
2017 F1 season
- Sepang pays Haas compensation for Grosjean’s 2017 crash
- Williams revenues rose in 2017 after Bottas deal with Mercedes
- Australian Grand Prix cost government £56 million last year
- “Grand Prix Driver” takes you inside McLaren’s nightmare final year with Honda
- Undisputed champion: 10 titles name Hamilton top driver of 2017
Nick Wyatt (@nickwyatt)
23rd March 2017, 7:34
If there are ten teams on the grid this year, whoever is last in the Constructor’s table is assured of tenth place money; is that correct? No team will end the year with nothing – which is a good thing – but maybe that’s a reason that Alonso is not so bothered about empty grid slots behind him.
Not that I would dare to compare the two, but last night I watched an old Formula Ford race on You Tube and there were over thirty cars on the grid, and it was marvellous. From a spectators point of view, more is definitely better.
Todfod (@todfod)
23rd March 2017, 7:47
I’m not sure if 30 cars will really add that much value. It just seems that the front runners will have more of a battle clearing backmarkers.
Nick Wyatt (@nickwyatt)
23rd March 2017, 10:50
Disagree. These people are racing drivers and they will scrap even over twentieth place. The more cars on track, the more chance we have of seeing some racing.
Shimks (@shimks)
23rd March 2017, 12:46
I love watching the backmarkers fight – even if they don’t get much TV time. I love reading about the backmarker teams and I love routing for these underdogs. Those drivers/teams fighting for podiums at the front of the pack are only part of the narrative of a race.
Uddipta jana
23rd March 2017, 22:02
Same here,nd the midfield battle is also attractive
Tiomkin
23rd March 2017, 9:30
Well said. Alonso knows he’ll probably be in last place and would like some money. I hope his dream comes true.
ECWDanSelby (@ecwdanselby)
23rd March 2017, 8:26
I think it’s a very short-sighted view from Fernando there.
Is he forgetting what team gave him his break in F1?
I’m sure there would have been a few big shots at the time saying exactly the same thing as Fernando, “we don’t need those small teams”…
Short memories.
BigJoe
23rd March 2017, 9:29
He probably couldnt care either way. He was asked a question. Did you read the interview ?
What about this: “Obviously it’s nice to have many cars on the track and many teams in Formula One.”
How is that short-sighted or forgetting anything?
stefano (@alfa145)
23rd March 2017, 12:29
Minardi was integrated in Toro Rosso, it’s another identity but the team is still the same in Faenza, Italy.
OOliver
23rd March 2017, 8:56
The payment system has got worse since Alonso got his break. There will always be small teams
hahostolze (@hahostolze)
23rd March 2017, 9:40
Of course he doesn’t want those grid slots filled. More teams means more teams finishing ahead of McLaren.
Todfod (@todfod)
23rd March 2017, 10:04
Last year’s debutant (Haas) almost finished in front of Mclaren. The last thing Alonso wants is another back marking. team to give him a harder time getting in to Q2
Kie
23rd March 2017, 10:43
26 Cars please. How it should be.
UNEEDAFINN2WIN
23rd March 2017, 11:45
Have to disagree with Ronin here, 26 (I didn’t realise it was restricted) cars is much better. That gives us more action, more drivers get on the grid to gain experience, more is more in this case.
Won’t happen with the current economics but here’s hoping
vibjorn
23rd March 2017, 17:10
yepp i agree 26 competetive cars is what mr brawn will be aiming for i`m sure (i hope). more cars more action and more
sound.
Ambrogio
23rd March 2017, 20:36
6 cars more = more drivers = di resta, buemi, di grassi, gasly, nasr, vergne (OK maybe three of them and three with big money). I think there are drivers that deserves a shot and probably will never get it with just 20 slots. Yet already f1 never gave a possibility to drivers like Frijns, Leimer or Valsecchi and in the past to Kristensen, Brack, De Ferran, Lopez, Jorg Muller, Collard…